Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Pierre-Yves Lapersonne@programming.dev to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 9 hours ago

Chat Control approved: Certain EU countries will see your private messages. Is yours on the list?

euroweeklynews.com

external-link
message-square
23
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
89
external-link

Chat Control approved: Certain EU countries will see your private messages. Is yours on the list?

euroweeklynews.com

Pierre-Yves Lapersonne@programming.dev to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 9 hours ago
message-square
23
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • [email protected]
  • [email protected]
Chat Control: EU will see your private messages
euroweeklynews.com
external-link
EU governments have finally agreed on a controversial new law that gives a backdoor to reading text messages and viewing photo messages
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Blackdoomax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Is there something we can do to effectively oppose that shit ?

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 minutes ago

      https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    7 hours ago

    misleading headline, this isn’t a list of countries in which the law will (if it passes) be different (it won’t be, it’s an EU law, so will be the same in all EU countries), it’s a list of countries that currently support/oppose the law

    • unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It isn’t misleading (that’d be a technically true headline, which this isn’t). This is a downright lie, or as some might say, “fake news”.

  • dave@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Countries which support the implementation of Chat Control:

    Spain, Romania, Portugal, Malta Lithuania, Hungary, Ireland, France, Denmark, Croatia, Cyprus, and Bulgaria.

    Countries that are undecided:

    Belgium, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Slovakia, and Sweden.

    Countries which oppose Chat Control:

    Slovenia, the Netherlands, Poland, Luxembourg, Germany, Estonia, Finland, the Czech Republic, and Austria

    • Kroko@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      “This list is outdated, see here fightchatcontrol.eu”

  • moretruth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Wow, this is bad. I thought this was over when Germany chose not to support it. Apparently not!

    • Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Show is not over until the fat lady sings.

  • truthfultemporarily@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’m missing a bit the fact that this is not a law yet. This is the position of the commission, which the parliament will then need to approve and has to get past the ECHR as well most likely.

  • RodgeGrabTheCat 🇨🇦🏴‍☠️@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    If this came to Canada, my sister and I will be using Briar.

  • Armand1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s kind of unclear what “voluntary” means. Is it voluntary for countries to enforce? Is it voluntary for companies to scan chats?

    • DacoTaco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      The later. However, they could still be fines for not doing what is needed to reduce “the risks of the of the chat app”, whatever the fuck that can mean when talking about illegal.content

    • Tywèle [she|her]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I thought it was the latter.

      • Armand1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        In that case, is there any change? Companies could already do that if they wanted. Many of them already did.

  • DuskyRo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Welp guys, looks like I’m moving to [insert country without that sh*t] (TBD). Or atleast my router is.

    • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The implementation is client-side, so this wouldn’t work. It forces all apps to have a client-side backdoor.

  • E_coli42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    just use signal

    • bjrn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Or Molly (alternative and more secure FOSS Android app for Signal), or Session or SimpleX.

    • slazer2au@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      And when they pull out of Europe because they won’t comply?

      • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        It is available in fdroid

        • mybuttnolie@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          56 minutes ago

          won’t help when their servers block access from EU

          • obamakitten@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 minutes ago

            Wow, you mean taking instant messenger suggestions from Republicans in the House of Representatives organizing gangbangs wasn’t a good idea?

      • Gutek8134@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Write your own E2E encrypted peer-to-peer chat app (nobody has got time for that) or use some that doesn’t care about the law (pretty risky if it’s not open source, I doubt they’ll survive for long in the open), I guess

Privacy@lemmy.ml

privacy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

  • Lemmy.ml libre_culture
  • Lemmy.ml privatelife
  • Lemmy.ml DeGoogle
  • Lemmy.ca privacy

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 403 users / day
  • 2.11K users / week
  • 5.26K users / month
  • 14.7K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 43.4K subscribers
  • 4.49K Posts
  • 113K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • k_o_t@lemmy.ml
  • tmpod@lemmy.pt
  • Yayannick@lemmy.ml
  • ranok@sopuli.xyz
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org