classic

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Given the OP, maybe it’s not flawed vision, but close to human vision. Elon’s philosophy of trying to max out simulating people is not a great tech solution when there were better choices.

        • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          6 hours ago

          It is fundamentally flawed. Ask experts in the area. The state of the art is nowhere near what better classes of sensors will do. This is exactly the sort of stupidity that caused iRobot to be overtaken in the home space and go down to penny stock status.

          And, yes, it comes down to Elon’s philosophy, which is often remarkably dumb.

          • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I believe vision-only is driven by legal issues. There will be times when vision and other sensors provide conflicting info. If a car crashes, it will be deemed at fault if the vision recording shows it made a mistake (even though other sensors induce it made the right call) - this is because any judge or jury can really only interpret the vision data. Thus there is no point is having the car make any choices other than what vision indicates.

            • Doomsider@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Automated systems have existed for a long time that can react much faster than visual stimulation.

              Even our own body does this to prevent us from getting burned. If you touch something hot your pain receptors fire off much fast than it would take for you to see your hand getting burned. You pull away your hand quickly, which is another body reaction, preventing further injury.

              We should be using multiple system just like the human body does to prevent injury. Any system we design me should also be redundant just like the human body as well. We should not be relying solely on vision for autonomous vehicles.

              • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Yes. The human body should not be the standard when we could equip a machine with a far more robust view of the world with little difficulty.

                Sticking with human features (camera-based vision, bipedal locomotion, etc.) is remarkably dumb. (Elon’s m.o.)