When it has been demonstrated over and over again, how little they think of anyone beneath them.

  • andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    so if i become wealthy by winning the lottery then i should get my head chopped off? after all wealthy is wealthy and they are all evil. …

    that is the dumbest take i’ve seen so far.

    just because you get wealthy doesn’t mean you are evil. how this is hard to understand is beyond me. I’m about done with lemmy and this type of thinking. are there evil people? yes. but just doing a blanket statement is just showing a lack of judgement and piss poor logic.

    • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      Lol, go ahead and point me to a single example of a lottery winner being cited as one of the oppressive ‘elite’. And if you are able to actually fine one, my answer will be “yes, in fact, that would should have their head in a basket”. Having a mountain of cash dropped on you, vs exploiting a mountain of people to obtain mountains of cash are not the same thing. How this is hard to understand is beyond me.

      I’m about done with lemmy and this type of thinking.

      Yeah if you’re gonna come here and play damage control for evil people, you’re not gonna have a good time on Lemmy.

    • doben@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I’m not necessarily agreeing with the head chopping part on a general basis, but consider this:

      If you become wealthy (which is a nebulous term, but w/e) in this system you automatically gain power over the life of other people, while you yourself break free from being forced into laboring for others. You are not going to spend it all on consumables, so you will likely use it to pay other people to do stuff for you, that you either can’t be bothered to do yourself or are not skilled to do yourself. So you’ll be able to live off of the labor of others, less fortunate. You are extracting value from them, maybe even creating some kind of dependency through the power imbalance.

      TL;DR: Share your wealth or get fucked, parasite ;)

      (and no, extracting value for your personal benefit is not sharing)

      E: So, it’s more of: do you have the means to free yourself from labor, while at the same time you exploit the people that don’t have that freedom, then your wealth becomes a problem and through your wealth you do become a problem for the working class.

      • andrewta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 minutes ago

        I’m just going to respond to the tldr.

        I’m very small reasonable percentage. But that’s for me to decide what is reasonable. Not anybody else. After that, I’m going to live a better life and yes, I’ll hire people on to do stuff that I don’t want to do or not capable of doing. And I’m going to travel the world and see things that a lot of people can’t do. I don’t have to share beyond that. So I guess I’ll just go get fucked, but hey, you know what I don’t give a shit. As long as a person is sharing a reasonable percentage of their income, that’s good enough. Telling a person to share so much that they can’t afford to pay other people to do the stuff they don’t want to do or aren’t capable of is in my opinion, just stupid. Tell me a person to share so much that they can no longer travel around the world and see nice things and live a better life in my opinion is just stupid.