• twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m not sure how I feel about this game. Seems like a less ambitious NMS.

    • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Given how many systems NMS has and how disconnected they often feel from one another, taking a more focused approach might work out better for the game.

      • tburkhol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        “Infinite” universes, like NMS or Starfield sound good in marketing, but if you’re really moving around them, at scale speeds, they can’t help but feel isolated and instanced. Even LNF, if it’s a whole ‘earth like’ planet, is huge. Earth has about 50M square miles of habitable surface - if you drop 10,000,000 people in there randomly, you’re going to have to walk half an hour to have a chance to find another player, if they happen to be on at the same time. It shouldn’t have the sharp breaks between biomes that fast-travel to a different planet gives, and I expect that will make it feel a lot more coherent.

        • Maestro@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Not only do they feel isolated, they also feel the same. NMS technically has billions of unique planets. In practice it has about 10 or so because they all feel the same. And even those look alike because they’re all sparsely populated worlds. Big stretches of emptiness filled with the occasional POI. Where are the mega city planets? The forge worlds with heavy industry? Any city with more than 100 inhabitants?