• scytale@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 days ago

    They also have the cabin lights on while driving at night, which no sane person would do in real life.

  • Axolotl@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Almost everthing tech releated. Every time it just stupid things or random words and my brain can’t continue to look at the movie…jeez i can’t think how bad it is for physicists XD

      • panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        6 days ago

        Real life:

        drafts email this is Mark from Facebook, your account is suspicious, please send me you’re passwords please

        8 hours later: I’m in

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I feel like Swordfish at least did a halfway decent job at movie “hacking”. Wonky interface aside, it’s him spending days in front of a computer, drinking and writing the exploit, then just running it when they break into the bank.

          • TVA@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 days ago

            They went the extra mile. A lot of it was actual exploits too and not just random HTML like I’ve seen in some shows, lol. They purposely would change a few things or not show something though to not be accused of showing people how to actually hack. That plus the way they show social engineering being an integral part of the process made it an incredibly refreshing show to watch.

            I also loved how in a scene Elliot is starting to technobabble and a character is like “yeah, we know what a Raspberry Pi is dipshit” but he got just far enough in the explanation that if the audience didn’t previously know, they still got the jist.

            • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              I also liked that they didn’t just show social engineering as like this cool thing where you outsmart someone and walk away. Several times in that show it Elliot had to just completely destroy someone who’d done nothing wrong just because they happened to be the person in the way at the time.

              EG: https://youtu.be/vSYSJTt_Cto

  • [deleted]@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    Helmet lights that illuminate the face like in Prometheus would be extremely distracting in real life.

    After seeing some YouTube guy show how holding a non-directional light source like a torch or lantern in front make it impossible to see whatever is past it that one bugs me. It was kinda obvious from camping as a kid and playing Indiana Jones, but it is just so common in movies that I’m the repetition makes it look normal.

  • Arkhive@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    In The Shining, when the family is being given a tour of the hotel fairly early in the movie, they get shown the walk in fridge. There is a shot of the door to the fridge from the hallway and then a cut to a shot from the back of the fridge looking toward the door. The hinges are on opposite sides between the two shot. Immersion ruined.

    • stickly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m 50:50 on if that’s a mistake or an deliberate subtle error. There’s a lot of stuff in The Shining that’s clearly intentionally wrong (lighting, building layout, maps, event continuity, etc…) in order to subconsciously reinforce the unnatural aura of the hotel. Of course that also gives Kubrick a free license to cut corners.

      • Arkhive@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Definitely could be the case, but it seems like an even smaller detail than a lot of those other, intentional discontinuities. Like I noticed it while watching it with someone and asked them to rewind to check and they didn’t believe me until I convinced them to rewind.

        A similar thing happened at the very end of the new Frankenstein movie, but I think this was intentional. The shot of the monster is flipped, so all his scars are mirrored. I think this is meant to sort of break the fourth wall and imply a mirror being held up to the audience and showing us to be the monster as part of the final humanization of the character.

        So decision like this definitely get made for story telling purposes. There’s a video essay by, I think, CinemaStix about shots that were mirrored for various reasons. It’s a good watch.