This will kill EV adoption, just to put it into perspective this is the equivalent of an average ICE car (38.6MPG) having 25.5p added per litre of fuel, in a single budget.

The even more ridiculous thing is plug in hybrids are 1.5p per mile, so people with 80+ miles of range in their Golfs etc. will pay half price, even though they are needlessly dragging around an internal combustion engine for 99% of their journeys.

  • FelixCress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Depends on what you are trying to achieve

    It was you talking about fairness.

    Also the heavier EV argument is a bit weak, they are not much heavier, and wear and tear when the roads that have to cope with 30ton lorries?

    These 30t lorries are paying significantly more tax than normal vehicles, nevermind EVs. Would you perhaps prefer vehicles to be taxed according to their weight?

    The road infrastructure needs to be maintained or we don’t get any deliveries, and the shops have no stock, it’s not just drivers that need the roads.

    It is vehicles using the roads and vehicle owners/keepers (not “drivers”) paying the taxes - and rightly so.

    • manualoverride@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      It was you talking about fairness.

      No, it wasn’t, I didn’t mention fairness because that is not my point at all, my focus is moving away from ICE vehicles.

      prefer vehicles to be taxed according to their weight?

      As long as all safety system weight is removed from the calculation then maybe! We don’t want companies sacrificing safety for weight reduction.

      Also significant changes should only apply to new vehicles, so the rules don’t change retrospectively after people have already made significant financial decisions based on government policy.

      • FelixCress@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        No, it wasn’t, I didn’t mention fairness because that is not my point at all

        That you?:

        In order to introduce this they needed to apply it to both ICE and EVs equally

        Normal cars are taxed per your own calculations twice as much as EVs. That is far away from “equal” treatment but at least EVs owners now will START contributing.

        • manualoverride@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Fairness and equality are different words and mean different things, you also cut off the second half of that quote in an attempt to prove your point.