You’re stubbornly refusing to accept that polysemy exists, and as a result are insisting that everyone else use your definition instead of the commonly accepted one.
Which, again, is all completely irrelevant since you can call these “A” and “B” and get exactly the same correct predictions.
You’re stubbornly refusing to accept that polysemy exists, and as a result are insisting that everyone else use your definition instead of the commonly accepted one.
Which, again, is all completely irrelevant since you can call these “A” and “B” and get exactly the same correct predictions.