• ☭ Comrade Pup Ivy 🇨🇺@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Agnosticism and Gnosticism are claims of knowing your belief not the belief, a baby would be an agnostic (doesn’t know if a god exists) athiest (doesn’t belive a god exists) sure its meaningless at this point because the baby doesn’t even know about the conspt of a god to be able to belive or disbelive, no information of this baby has been shared this is by default because ot doesn’t know enough to change either state

    • La Dame d'Azur@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      Right, which is my point: we’re all born agnostic as we haven’t been exposed to the concept of religion yet and thus cannot make the decision to believe (theism) or disbelieve (atheism).

      • ☭ Comrade Pup Ivy 🇨🇺@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        It would be agnostic athiest, no knowledge of if god exists AND you lack a belief in god.

        As I have said many many times athieism isnt a disbilef its a lack of one. A baby does not belive in a god or gods SO BY DEFFINITION they must be an athiest. If someone grew up their whole life never hearing about the idea of a god or gods, and lacks a belief in god they are still an athiest, because thats the deffinition, a lack of a belief in god or gods.

        Agnostism and Gnostism are not matters in that discussion.