Cipherd@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agofunctionslemmy.mlimagemessage-square119fedilinkarrow-up1638arrow-down19file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1629arrow-down1imagefunctionslemmy.mlCipherd@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agomessage-square119fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 month agoThe examples on the meme don’t bind any variables. If those are lambdas, the Haskell version is just the ... part.
minus-squareidunnololz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month agoI mean if we are talking lambdas the kotlin would just be {}
minus-squareandrybak@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agotoo bad they chose :: for type declaration instead of :
Meanwhile Haskell:
=
\x -> …
The examples on the meme don’t bind any variables. If those are lambdas, the Haskell version is just the
...part.I mean if we are talking lambdas the kotlin would just be {}
too bad they chose
::for type declaration instead of: