A New Jersey woman who was found bound with zip ties in the woods and marked with a derogatory phrase referencing President Donald Trump is now accused of staging the attack.
Natalie Greene, 26, is charged with conspiracy to convey false statements and hoaxes and making false statements to federal law enforcement.
According to court documents, Greene and a co-conspirator called 911 late July 23 and claimed that three men had attacked them on a trail at the Egg Harbor Township Nature Reserve. The co-conspirator told dispatchers the men referenced Greene by name and mentioned her job in politics. According to reports, Greene previously worked for a Republican congressman.
Yeah, and people who did that are fucking psychos.
And those are “your” people. The same people who say the shooter was a right wing loon, are the same people who celebrate what he did. You know, like the other person who is currently replying to me…
When you choose to paint with that wide of a brush, you’re setting yourself up to make false examples of hypocrisy. Do you have any evidence that the person who’s currently replying to you celebrated the killers actions?
I noticed that you suddenly understood nuance when accused of idolizing Charlie kirk.
… Seriously?
Replies you would have seen, had you not been running head long into trying to be smart…
Actually, thats my point. That you lot dont understand nuance. You all dismiss this guy as being left wing, as though it would be some reflection on you. When thats just not true. Its like saying “all men are rapists”. Its dumb, but people say it because some men are. This is the point Ive been trying to get at. That you are all being weird as fuck about the guy being left wing, like it matters at all. Its a weird fucking hill to die on. Especially from a nation of dumb witted morons who think they are left wing…
Who do you think I was talking about when I said “the person you were currently talking to”?
They said, without knowing what fucking lot I’m in. Jesus Christ you just bucket everyone that’s says something you don’t like into one group, but when it comes to yourself you understand the concept of individuals. Then you go around and complain about “you lot” not understanding nuance. Do you see the hypocrisy in your actions?
Did I say anything to you to cast me into “you lot”, besides just saying something you dislike? Can you define what that lot is?
Dear fucking god, I didnt realise you needed the special crayons to understand basic fucking English.
Cute. Answer the questions.