• Bloefz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It could also cost our lives as a US “ally”. Since they are the only fighter jet my country (Holland) is buying. Since China is a strong supporter of Russia it’s sure that they will get access to any countermeasures as well.

      IMO we should sell those things and buy something else like the much cheaper alternatives from Europe.

      But my country is also becoming pretty fascist and idealises America so they probably will just cave.

      At least there’s still countries like Spain who have already cancelled their F-35 order 👏

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      If you look at the history of military operations performed by both countries, it’s pretty clear which one is the more likely option

        • balsoft@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          China nowadays has the capacity to steamroll half of asia into compliance. Instead they build alliances/partnerships via trade, even with countries they ideologically disagree with. It’s less profitable in the short-term but leads to more predictable and stable development in the region, which benefits them massively in the long-term. Crazy what you can do if you think in centuries and not quarters.

            • balsoft@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              37 minutes ago

              ¿Por qué no los dos? I mean, if you actually go to developing nations you will see that they are investing into real infrastructure that improves the standards of living dramatically. They also intend to turn some profit off of it. Most likely much of that profit will be in building long-term economic relations, rather than immediate rent-seeking, which can be viewed as “trapping nations in debt traps”, or as “investing into development”. They also invest with much fewer strings attached compared to IMF, which is a win comparatively speaking.