• frazw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Yeah the logic always stuns me.

    “If I vote for a Democrat they’ll probably take some of my money through taxes and I’ll be poor”

    Trump wins and ruins their business, they lose all of their money.

    “At least I’m not poor because of evil Democrat taxes”

    They have truly been brainwashed. Whatever bad shit republicans do they still believe the Democrats must be worse, because the republicans told them so. Even though the republicans have provably been lying to them for years.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah the logic always stuns me.

      It shouldn’t. It’s very common on both sides of the aisle. Never heard “vote blue no matter who”? That term was coined and used by large swaths of non-Republicans who agreed to vote for someone they don’t agree with about everything. The fact is that it’s extremely rare for any voter to be 100% aligned with the views of the person they vote for.

      Actually, if you think about it, isn’t it more selfish to change who you vote for based on how you personally are affected by their policies?

    • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      57
      ·
      5 hours ago

      …And the Left does the same thing.

      Back in the day, a lot of folks couldn’t bring themselves to vote for Jimmy Carter because he wouldn’t take a strong stand on South African apartheid. We got ronald reagan who embraced embrace South Africa.

      • Triumph@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s not at all how that played out.

        One, John Anderson ran as an independent in 1980, after losing the Republican primary. He had been a Republican until then. Early in that primary, he was a viable candidate for the nomination. He was initially likely to take more votes from Reagan than Carter.

        Anderson supported the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), as well as an extension to the time for it to be ratified. The Republican party did not. Carter refused to debate Anderson; Reagan did not. On top of all that, at the time, the conventional wisdom was that Carter was a weak president, partially because of the still-imprisoned diplomats in Tehran, and a failed attempt to extricate them - which Carter took full responsibility for. This set of later circumstances probably took more votes from Carter. All that said, Reagan swept the popular vote by almost nine points, and took the electoral college handily.

        Source: I was there.