Reading this shit gives me an aneurism.

  • NoPanko@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    No it’s “ why is someone purposefully making their comments harder to understand, i find that annoying” which is valid. Their post made no insult to the person themselves and no call to action against them. All they did was imply it is mildly infuriating based on the community they posted in, which i am inclined to agree with

      • NoPanko@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Let met put it like this; if you were to put my comment on “mildlyinfuriating” right now because you disagree with me, i would be fine with that. You have every right to be infuriated with me, and if my username was on that post, that would not be grounds for removing your post. That is because at the end of the day you have every right to voice your mild annoyance with me, and that annoyance does not constitute harassment. People disagree, that is life, if you think someone disagreeing with how someone conducts themselves online is an insult that is on you. If all criticism is invalid to you that is on you. But criticism is not slander, it is acceptable commentary, grow the fuck up

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I think you’d have to be a psycho to do that. However I don’t believe that in any way compares to the situation.