• BioMan@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I wonder what will happen to all the data-center-specialized hardware when the demand falls through the floor. SOMEONE will buy it, the question is what will people figure out how to use it for despite it not being like ordinary consumer hardware.

    • David Gerard@awful.systemsOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s chips specifically optimised to FP8 and FP4 without video outputs. Its only use is machine learning. That’s assuming the hardware doesn’t die of overheating in short order. This stuff was born to be e-waste.

      • BioMan@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Of course. People who have money and don’t need to make money will use it.

  • Ilixtze@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I support the Anti data center activism that involves explosives.

    • corbin@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      24 hours ago

      In my personal and professional opinion, most datacenter outages are caused by animals disturbing fiber or power lines. Consider campaigning for rewilding instead; it’s legal and statistically might be more effective.

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Think just blocking off the air vents would also work. Same thing with billionaire bunkers, block the airvents, weld the doors shut.

      • corbin@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Unlike a bunker, a datacenter’s ventilation consists of [DATA EXPUNGED] which are out of reach. The [DATA EXPUNGED] are heavily [DATA EXPUNGED], so [DATA EXPUNGED] unlikely to work either. However, this ventilation must be [DATA EXPUNGED] in order to effectively [DATA EXPUNGED], and that’s done by [DATA EXPUNGED] into the [DATA EXPUNGED] and [DATA EXPUNGED] to prevent [DATA EXPUNGED].

        Edit: making the joke funnier.

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          23 hours ago

          politely: while I understand the impulse behind this discursive angle, it’s probably not the greatest idea to have it here

          • Soyweiser@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            Yeah, I was just trying to make a joke about how explosives are overkill (and point out that the billionare bunkers are prob not as secure as they would hope (still mad about them building bunkers instead of you know doing anything positive)), not really trying to make a real plan to stop them.

            And tbh, we know what to do with malicious datacenters, esp if they are in bunkers, the Dutch/German police has gone after a few of them. The trick is to wait till their MDMA lab catches fire, and then you arrest them.