• Metz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    It is explained here https://grapheneos.org/usage#web-browsing

    They don’t explicitly mention Firefox but:

    "Chromium-based browsers like Vanadium provide the strongest sandbox implementation, leagues ahead of the alternatives. "

    and

    "Chromium has decent exploit mitigations, unlike the available alternatives. "

    Since I myself lack the knowledge and skills to judge this, I have to trust the word of the developers.

    Edit, correction. They do mention Firefox

    “Avoid Gecko-based browsers like Firefox as they’re currently much more vulnerable to exploitation and inherently add a huge amount of attack surface.”

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Merely asserting something and explaining it to my satisfaction (as a developer myself) are two different things. I don’t want to have to read through both codebases myself, but I would have liked the Graphene OS devs to cite some examples to prove their point.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Seriously. I’ve never heard of firefox being more vulnerable than chrome. It could be, but realistically not many groups are looking for exploits in a browser with 3% market share

        • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Really? Didn’t seem to to me; I just installed latest GrapheneOS on my pixel 9 this weekend, and Vanadium definitely let Google Adsense crap all over many sites I visited.

          Is there a way to enable effective ad blocking that I missed?