Do not. The person you’re arguing with is saying a pedophile is not a rapist, never said it was fine, and you’re arguing with them.
2-3. See point 1.
Actually, the way we use the term Fetish colloquially is how the term Paraphelia is used in psychology. A non-con fetish is a paraphelia. The reason I used ‘non-con’ is because, like pedophelia, it can be redirected in legal forms of sexual expression.
What’s concerning is calling everything you don’t like or don’t understand concerning, and hinting that people arguing with you are pedophiles.
Again, you argued with someone who tried to point out pedophelia doesn’t make someone a rapist. You brought up the nature of a fantasy as a point of argument, which I responded to.
Thank you for telling me my lived experience of sexual abuse is ridiculous and again reiterating that you think I don’t understand SA, which means my viewpoint is wrong. Very appreciative of that. You should definitely take pride that you “won” an argument on the internet in that way.
2-3. See point 1.
What’s concerning is calling everything you don’t like or don’t understand concerning, and hinting that people arguing with you are pedophiles.
Again, you argued with someone who tried to point out pedophelia doesn’t make someone a rapist. You brought up the nature of a fantasy as a point of argument, which I responded to.
Your entire last paragraph is ridiculous.
Thank you for telling me my lived experience of sexual abuse is ridiculous and again reiterating that you think I don’t understand SA, which means my viewpoint is wrong. Very appreciative of that. You should definitely take pride that you “won” an argument on the internet in that way.
Uh huh. Have a good night.