a revolutionist is only limited by the tools of the regime if they play by their rules. if they were okay with breaking those rules, they could build whatever tools they meed, even if forbidden.
I meant more technologically/ideologically limited. not legally limited. As in you cannot use a collectively owned tech services if they don’t exist. Obviously no revolutionist should be concerned with legality.
a revolutionist is only limited by the tools of the regime if they play by their rules. if they were okay with breaking those rules, they could build whatever tools they meed, even if forbidden.
I meant more technologically/ideologically limited. not legally limited. As in you cannot use a collectively owned tech services if they don’t exist. Obviously no revolutionist should be concerned with legality.