io@piefed.blahaj.zone to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoChatcontrol news!piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up1317arrow-down11file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1316arrow-down1imageChatcontrol news!piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneio@piefed.blahaj.zone to Privacy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square6fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squarewiegell@feddit.dklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-23 hours agoYea i read that, but isn’t this post about that not being an issue anymore?? // Edit: I mean in particular Patrick Breyer was been critical about the revised proposal, so him posting this now suggests that something new has happened?
minus-squareunexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoYes and the new thing that happened is the section “17a” shown in this post i would assume.
Yea i read that, but isn’t this post about that not being an issue anymore?? // Edit: I mean in particular Patrick Breyer was been critical about the revised proposal, so him posting this now suggests that something new has happened?
Yes and the new thing that happened is the section “17a” shown in this post i would assume.