• IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I just want to do something simple like let a program use port 67 without having to disable hyper-v. Nope, that’s apparently too difficult. Gotta go through hoops to “turn Windows features on or off” to kill hyper-v.

    • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      To be fair, Linux systems also require superuser rights for a process which wants to bind to a port below 1024. 67 and 68 today are DHCP/BOOTP, and HyperV binds that port to provision IP addresses to VMs, just like it gets bound by the virtual machine manager on my pc when i open it. Only difference is that Hyper-V is always active and i have to open the VM-Manager.

      • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It’s the always active part that is the problem. I wouldn’t care if I needed elevated rights to do it when I needed to. Instead I literally have to use a virtual machine to set addresses on some devices, or else have to go through the update and restart process required to turn it off. And then turn it back on again to use the VM I need.

        I truly hate that crappy industrial software has me chained to windows at work.