No tolerance for Nazis, or people who vote for Nazis. No tolerance for MAGA, or people who vote for MAGA.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Say it louder for the people in the back. Some yankistani “historian” here on lemmy, literally said Nazis they hired after the war were fine because they learned “american values”.

      • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Wasn’t Hitler partly inspired by the Jim Crow laws present in the US at the time? Pretty sure Nazis have always espoused “American values”.

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well yes, the US took the best Nazi scientists so they could beat the country that helped defeat the Nazis to the Moon.

        What’s so difficult to understand here?

        Only interests, not values.

  • Caffie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    3 days ago

    Here is a longer version of this:

    “And people did this, just like you, you and me. These people did not come from another planet. […] They were human beings, just like us. And it was not Hitler who arrested me, not Goering, not Goebbels. The grocer, the janitor, the tailor, the shoemaker, the baker, they suddenly got a uniform, a swastika armband, and there they were, the master race…”

    From this site: https://www.nationalfonds.org/announcement/recollections-of-auschwitz-at-buch-wien-2021

    • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Some take away from this that the grocer, the janitor, the tailor, the shoemaker, and the baker are to be forgiven as it would be inhumane to punish everyday people.

      And then turn around and claim the Nuremburg Trials were inhumane because Streicher didn’t personally shoot anyone.

      The banality of evil became so much more of a defense than the indictment it should have been and should still be.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    True, but fascism is the larger problem. The Nazis were defeated. But the fascists are still in power.

    Focusing solely on the nazis obscures the majority of victims of fascism (both before 1, 2 and after, etc.) and creates a false narrative of historical exceptionalism, when fascism has been normalized for centuries even tho often called by other names.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Another way to look at this is that grifters and power hungry people always exist, it’s only when the average person gives them attention that it rots society.

    It’s those who were just following orders that make it a reality.

    • lectricleopard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      3 days ago

      No shelter. No compromise. No conversation.

      You must convince people that minorities are a threat. By contrast, the world knows Nazis are dangerous, and I will not allow even a moment of my mental energy will be wasted trying to reason with a Nazi. The hatred they ooze is not within reason, and it doesn’t deserve the miniscule amount of respect thats required to have a conversation.

      When they are not allowed to engage with their detractors, they whine and pound the table. It makes me smile.

    • FlyingCircus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s a good question. How far must we go to ensure that “Never Again” is reality? The resurrection of fascism in the US and Germany show that mere social ostracism or even outlawing Nazi rhetoric outright does nothing when people get complacent and the capitalist elites start spewing propaganda.

      • Banana@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        3 days ago

        We must ensure nobody gets absolute power, because power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

        You keep wealth distributed evenly among a population and have their needs met and these things don’t happen.

        • Serinus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well, not all the way evenly. It’s fine to have relatively rich and poor. Money should be a measure of what your society owes you, and society owes my doctor more than it owes my deadbeat… whatever, who just doesn’t want to get a job.

          Make that doctor as many lattes and avocado toasts as he wants.

          Everyone working 40 hours a week should be able to ask their neighbors for things like “take my garbage from the curb to the dump” or “educate my kids” or “make me a sandwich”. That is the concept of money at its core.

          We’ll say the going rate for a skilled worker is $100k a year with a working lifetime of ~40 years, about $4m in total. Ain’t nobody out there that deserves the lifetime’s work of 250 people working solely for them, 40 hours a week, ~44 weeks a year. (That’s about a billion dollars.) Yeah, maybe you can control that many people or more if you’re working towards a common purpose and providing value for others, but that would be a billion dollars in gross income that’s redistributed, not net profit for one person.

          • Banana@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            I mean, I don’t have the energy to discuss specifics, but I think at a very base level we agree here that people should contribute to society as much as they can and get what they need and that nobody should just get passive income.

          • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Well, not all the way evenly. It’s fine to have relatively rich and poor. Money should be a measure of what your society owes you, and society owes my doctor more than it owes my deadbeat… whatever, who just doesn’t want to get a job.

            your job does not give you dignity or worth.

            • Serinus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Yeah, it absolutely can. Yes, every person has base dignity and worth, but I absolutely have more respect for people who make a living saving lives, for instance. I respect doctors, nurses, firemen, scientists, architects, construction workers, mailmen.

              If you do absolutely nothing and provide nothing back to society, then yes, I have more respect for those other people who do serve their fellow man, generally.

  • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    I don’t believe that society will recognize me as a hero for doing something about them. I would expect a very long prison sentence or the death penalty. Is my unwillingness to act cowardice?

    • groet@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      You will be recognized. 50 years after your execution somebody will make a post on c/workingclasscalendar to celebrate your bravery.

      • lectricleopard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That might be all I really need.

        Edit: im reading beowulf, so i might be a little bit wound up by the heroic culture it describes.

  • WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Its the game that we gave power over humanity.

    We gave to the foundations that build this.

    We were naive I lived for something that wasn’t genuine humanity.

    We built it so big there’s no way out anymore.

    We got manipulated and owned.

    People need to put genuine humanity over lifestyles sold by nations.

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 days ago

    What a pathetic existence you have to become to fall for something so stupid.

    And to get ahead of the dumbness, them “really believing it” is being a pathetic enough existence to fall for something so stupid.

    • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Fascism is not the result of stupidity but the result of capitalist crisis.

      Fascism is what happens when social safety nets are removed, wages are withheld, education is withered, healthcare is not obtainable, and transportation crumbles.

      • FlyingCircus@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’d amend that to say fascism is what happens when capitalists allow those things to proliferate, then get scared that people will fight back. While fascism is indeed a petit-bourgeois ideology that arises from that class’s reaction to capitalist crisis, it’s important to remember that it is the bourgeois who are fascism’s beneficiaries and who are the first to foment it during crises.