ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day agoSchrödinger's marriage rulediscuss.onlineimagemessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1758arrow-down110
arrow-up1748arrow-down1imageSchrödinger's marriage rulediscuss.onlineByteOnBikes@discuss.online to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square33fedilink
minus-squareTyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·1 day agoHmm, no they’re also hypocrites, it’s not mutually exclusive
minus-squarevzqq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·20 hours agoThey are not hypocrites if they don’t believe in any of the stuff in the first place. Which they don’t. None of them do.
minus-squareTyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·19 hours agoThat’s a pretty fair assessment, is it hypocrisy if you’re not aware of the irony, I would argue so, but your point still stands, they don’t care for the truth at all. If they did, they might have to contend with the fact that they are monsters
Hmm, no they’re also hypocrites, it’s not mutually exclusive
They are not hypocrites if they don’t believe in any of the stuff in the first place. Which they don’t. None of them do.
That’s a pretty fair assessment, is it hypocrisy if you’re not aware of the irony, I would argue so, but your point still stands, they don’t care for the truth at all. If they did, they might have to contend with the fact that they are monsters