I’m sorry if this question has already been asked, but I’m just wondering, what your opinions are about lichess and chess.com? Lichess is a nonprofit and open-source and seems more ethical to me, but chess.com has more features. I’ve been using chess.com for years, but thinking of switching over to lichess or some other application.

  • Cat_Daddy [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I’ve used lichess exclusively for a few years now. I’ve never looked back. I was a diamond subscriber on chess.com for a long time because I wanted access to game analysis and unlimited puzzles. I get that for free on lichess, and as you mentioned, they’re a more ethical org.

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Lichess has way more puzzles, and IIRC from some youtube I watched a while ago, lichess has other things chess.com does not.

    So it’s not as clear cut, even if you forget the insane price for chess.com.

  • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I honestly can’t imagine why anyone would ever use anything but lichess except for ignorance or because they’re literally being paid to use chess.com.

    • onwardknave [he/him,comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      A lot of big name steamers have deals with chess.com to only stream on their site, and some even have stake in chess.com. It’s an equity issue for sure. And I have low tolerance for anything Danny Rench says because it always feels like his words are somehow coated in money.

  • Mannivu@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I always feel chess.com is too much a for profit. Yes, it has many features, but you have to be a subscriber to access those (especially game analysis which can be quite useful while you’re starting to understand chess). I’ve played for a few months on chess.com before moving permanently to Lichess which has almost the same features and the missing ones (such as theoretical level of your game and move ratings) can be added via browser’s ads-ons.

  • faltryka@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I love lichess. It’s a brilliant platform and easily the most ethical online chess platform alternative out there.

    That said, I’m really not a big fan of Danny Rensch, so I kind of see chess.com as the evil option.

  • Johnny Cash@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Both have/had their issues with cheaters. I personally have a bad experience with chess.com’s costumer support (paid for but didn’t receive the membership). So when I want to play online casually lichess is my first choice. You can use both at the same time and see how they differ when it comes to puzzles, ratings, and all the extra content.

  • theherk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I think personally both are great, and both are great for the community; in different ways. Chess.com is a bit “pay pay pay please” for my taste but they do host a ton of events and sponsor many things. The interface is quite good and the cheating control is quite good.

    Lichess is better though, in my view. It is much more open, the interface is lightyears better in my view and the study / analysis tools are better too. However, reporting is much more cumbersome, because on mobile for example, you have to get a share link to the game, then use the website to report and actually explain in prose why you suspect foul play, even though simple click reports should be at least partially useful for trend analysis. However, their actual detection seems good too.

    All told, both are great ways to play chess, both use good rating systems (Glicko 1 and 2), both control cheating pretty well, and both suck the life out of me one bullet game at a time.