What I like or don’t doesn’t matter here. You’re going to do what your going to do. I’m merely pointing out the apparent logic of your responses. It’s up to you to decide if you like them.
Which it seems you might not, since you keep coming up with new excuses trying to justify your feelings.
Which now includes blaming me, as if your lack of reasonable justification is my fault.
K… It’s justifiable enough to me, and that’s enough for me, so if you’re upset enough to have a comment chain like this then… I guess I don’t know what you’re looking for. So, I’m probably going to stop replying because I’ve said why, and you rejected my why. Twice.
Read again. I never rejected anything. Literally all I did was point out the logic of your thinking. You could have agreed the logic I pointed out was in fact your correct belief. But instead you decided that logic wasn’t good enough, and responded with annother justification. That’s all that happened here.
Im not sure what logic you are pointing to. From what I’m seeing it just seems like you are angry people here don’t like or want to watch LTT. That’s my take away from the conversation thread anyways.
I never used an angry word. I’ve been nothing but civil. And I’m sorry I couldn’t explain your own logic to you well enough. That’s my failing.
You may be better served reading up on Behavior Modification Therapy. It’s more effective at producing positive changes in people, then the blanket shunning your doing.
You do come across as angry, but if not you should do some self reflecting on why people take your style of tone as being upset and angry. Right now you seem to have shifted to being passive aggressive.
Yah. That makes sense. After re-reading everything there are no aggressive statements; No explitives or insults. There’s nothing in thewords themselves displaying anger.
However it is common for people to see disagreement or contention as a hostile attack. Especially when contesting a perceived morality. The only sensible reason I can see my words would appear angry to you, is that you’re reading my words with your emotions and conflating the two.
So if I angered you in my questioning the validity of your moral condemnation, I apologize. It’s a regrettable consequence. One that’s common enough, I should have predicted it. I might have handled things differently if I had.
Even my previous comment you called passive agressive, was intended to be condescending. I could have softened that more.
I already gave my reason, you didn’t like it. It’s not my fault if you also didn’t like my second reason.
What I like or don’t doesn’t matter here. You’re going to do what your going to do. I’m merely pointing out the apparent logic of your responses. It’s up to you to decide if you like them.
Which it seems you might not, since you keep coming up with new excuses trying to justify your feelings.
Which now includes blaming me, as if your lack of reasonable justification is my fault.
K… It’s justifiable enough to me, and that’s enough for me, so if you’re upset enough to have a comment chain like this then… I guess I don’t know what you’re looking for. So, I’m probably going to stop replying because I’ve said why, and you rejected my why. Twice.
Read again. I never rejected anything. Literally all I did was point out the logic of your thinking. You could have agreed the logic I pointed out was in fact your correct belief. But instead you decided that logic wasn’t good enough, and responded with annother justification. That’s all that happened here.
Im not sure what logic you are pointing to. From what I’m seeing it just seems like you are angry people here don’t like or want to watch LTT. That’s my take away from the conversation thread anyways.
I never used an angry word. I’ve been nothing but civil. And I’m sorry I couldn’t explain your own logic to you well enough. That’s my failing.
You may be better served reading up on Behavior Modification Therapy. It’s more effective at producing positive changes in people, then the blanket shunning your doing.
You do come across as angry, but if not you should do some self reflecting on why people take your style of tone as being upset and angry. Right now you seem to have shifted to being passive aggressive.
Yah. That makes sense. After re-reading everything there are no aggressive statements; No explitives or insults. There’s nothing in thewords themselves displaying anger.
However it is common for people to see disagreement or contention as a hostile attack. Especially when contesting a perceived morality. The only sensible reason I can see my words would appear angry to you, is that you’re reading my words with your emotions and conflating the two.
So if I angered you in my questioning the validity of your moral condemnation, I apologize. It’s a regrettable consequence. One that’s common enough, I should have predicted it. I might have handled things differently if I had.
Even my previous comment you called passive agressive, was intended to be condescending. I could have softened that more.