Just playing the devil’s advocate butterfly, and I think we’ve grown to respect each other here, do you feel that the representation you see at work represents the majority of viewers, or do you feel that by the time you’ve seen them you are already seeing a sunset of viewers?
Essentially causation vs correlation. A square is a rectangle but a rectangle is not a square. People you see committing violence there is a correlation to violent pornography, but is there a correlation if violent pornography back to domestic violence? If so, is it a 1:1 correlation?
Just playing the devil’s advocate butterfly, and I think we’ve grown to respect each other here, do you feel that the representation you see at work represents the majority of viewers, or do you feel that by the time you’ve seen them you are already seeing a sunset of viewers?
Essentially causation vs correlation. A square is a rectangle but a rectangle is not a square. People you see committing violence there is a correlation to violent pornography, but is there a correlation if violent pornography back to domestic violence? If so, is it a 1:1 correlation?