• Blaze (he/him)@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Having to explain federation is kind of the issue in my opinion.

    I don’t, nowadays, I just point to piefed.zip

    This would just be an alternative

    The issue is that there aren’t really instances that are similar enough to be considered interchangeable. They all have their specificity, be it admin style, defederation, downvotes enabled or disabled, front-ends available, etc.

    • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah that’s a good point. Maybe it’s too different for it to work. I maintain that complexity will continue to push people away, though. If instances are that different we might have better luck referring to them as their own sites. That would just increase the flocking to single mega instances though. The most important feature of any social media site is who’s on it.

      • Blaze (he/him)@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s okay if they join one instance. I’m not a fan of the LW dominance, but it’s better to have another LW user than no user at all

        • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I would agree with that. I think the ability to spin up new instances if something goes wrong with a big one is still a great feature even if one gains dominance.

          I don’t know how hard account migration is right now, but that’s probably another UX thing to make easy if the devs decide to work on it.