Deceptichum@quokk.auM to PhilosophyMemes@quokk.auEnglish · 3 days agothis seems relativequokk.auimagemessage-square85fedilinkarrow-up1146arrow-down11
arrow-up1145arrow-down1imagethis seems relativequokk.auDeceptichum@quokk.auM to PhilosophyMemes@quokk.auEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square85fedilink
minus-squareHasturInYellow@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoI know you’re taking a piss, but why would forcing all things to be the same be necessarily moral?
minus-squareBrainsploosh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agoWhen arguing for a universal intent, it’s typically argued as virtuous/moral to further that intent, or at least immoral to go against that intent. The conclusions are bunk because the premise is bunk.
minus-squareHasturInYellow@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoAh. I suppose that makes some sense but yeah the whole premise of universal intent is just silly.
I know you’re taking a piss, but why would forcing all things to be the same be necessarily moral?
When arguing for a universal intent, it’s typically argued as virtuous/moral to further that intent, or at least immoral to go against that intent.
The conclusions are bunk because the premise is bunk.
Ah. I suppose that makes some sense but yeah the whole premise of universal intent is just silly.