Just a shower realisation… I never associated the two words before but it’s so obviously true.

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’d guess, yes. But most people will still vote for the political parties that will enable more wealth inequality. It might be extremely stupid, but politically the policies are everything but extreme. They are the broad consensus that people still vote for.

      • remon@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Well yes, depending on semantics it’s a very different question, so that’s kind of important.

        And while certainly is an extremists, I don’t think he his because of his fiscal policy or because he’s rich. Except for him going crazy with the tariffs, it’s mostly in line with what the republican party always did.

        I’d say he’s a political extremist when it comes to ignoring the law, immigration/deportation and the use of the ICE/military (both inside the country and against random boats now).

        So yes, he is. But not because he’s a billionaire (or rather millionaire).

        • dontsayaword@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          You accept that being able to con people into gaining their support doesn’t make someone not extremist, and that supporting income inequality is extremist. Ergo billionaires are extremists.

          • remon@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 hours ago

            and that supporting income inequality is extremist.

            I explained that it isn’t …