Whether we have in mind a comprehensive and certain remedy, is independent of whether a problem exists though. If someone objects generally to suffering and/or death in a way that goes beyond only what’s directly in front of them, to be intellectually honest with themselves they would have to contend with the scale of brutality of the natural world and our existence.

“We must change everything to not work this way” seems like a very straightforwardly coherent conclusion. What end result would actually be ideal, and the issues of getting there, could be considered separately.