• DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Idk Pug. Obviously agree all, as normal, but as a sci-fi fan, I gotta question the “satire.” Heinlein was quite pro-fascism. You don’t see that book as more of his ideal than his comedic hot take on a future scenario?

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      The movie is satire, while the book, as I said, “is either pseudofascist drivel or an interesting exploration of what a hypermilitarized sci-fi democracy might look like.”

      I tend to take a middle ground of the two positions - I don’t think Heinlein is outlining any sort of ideal society by his own measurements, only a society. At the same time, that he portrays the society as basically functional rather than fucked reveals a bit about his own prejudices and both conscious and subconscious ideas about human nature and politics.

      The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress is probably closer to his ideal society (though that comes with some problems of its own).

      • DaMonsterKnees@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I love communicating with you. Great feedback and Moon is on my reading list. Currently really enjoying the two newish Suzanne Collins additions to the hunger games universe. S&S was great and I’m on the latest, Haymitch origin story, now. Worth a read imo.

        • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Heinlein is a fantastic writer, if sometimes bizarre in a way that is not intended. Very, uh, eclectic mix of ideas in the man’s mind.

          Always happy to talk with you, you’re one of my favorite dogs on the internet 🙏

    • Caveman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I read the Views > Politics section on Wikipedia and it sounds like he’s a “Don’t tread on me” Libertarian type.

      • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        He was an ‘old-style’ libertarian, he had a very eclectic mixture of views, but was not left-wing as we would recognize it. More of a “free-market, free-association, free-love, pro-environmentalism” type that you rarely see anymore.