the logic is simple, but you are ignoring it.

you are providing examples where language is consistent with an algebraic formulation, and ignoring examples where it clearly is not.

if examples of both exist, then you plainly cannot treat language like algebra, because it’s not always correct.

you only need one counter-example to disprove a thesis. instead of discussing the counter examples provided, you think that providing more examples of consistency contributed to the conversation.

sorry, but they don’t. that’s not how logic works.