Not him, but feudalism wasn’t a state sponsored system in the modern sense. There was no bureaucratic, state-funded army or police force enforcing property rights. Each Lord maintained their own. Also, private property didn’t really exist. Land was held in a feif. Feudal institutions were set up to maintain feudal obligations and social order based on land tenure and status or whatever, not to protect private property or markets.
You liberals seem to be having a hard time understanding what basic words mean… so here. I’ll post the challenge again.
Find me an example of a state-funded murder-institution dedicated to the protection of private property before the advent of capitalism.
You’re not really describing what the issue what with their answer though
You mean apart from the fact that it doesn’t meet the challenge in any way whatsoever?
In what way?
Is the explanation offered by the poster above not good enough for you?
Not him, but feudalism wasn’t a state sponsored system in the modern sense. There was no bureaucratic, state-funded army or police force enforcing property rights. Each Lord maintained their own. Also, private property didn’t really exist. Land was held in a feif. Feudal institutions were set up to maintain feudal obligations and social order based on land tenure and status or whatever, not to protect private property or markets.