Babalugats@feddit.uk to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agoHow many cars are neededfeddit.ukimagemessage-square131fedilinkarrow-up1811arrow-down127
arrow-up1784arrow-down1imageHow many cars are neededfeddit.ukBabalugats@feddit.uk to Fuck Cars@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square131fedilink
minus-squareschema@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up193·edit-24 days agoA 175m road scaled in reference to the 35m wide lane:
minus-squarepemptago@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up59arrow-down2·4 days agoQuality contribution. I completely overlooked the relative sizes.
minus-squareThis is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down14·3 days ago I completely overlooked the relative sizes. Your mum’s fat. And so is your nana.
minus-squareNarrativeBear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 days agorelatives 🥁 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXivtoSkuVQ
minus-squaregandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoi mean yeah but how much of that energy can you get out of that uranium, and at what speed?
minus-squareHupf@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoWith about 200kg of the right kind, pretty much all of it quite quickly.
minus-squareAnnoyed_🦀 @lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·4 days agoYeah i was thinking that too, no way 175m is that narrow.
minus-squarexep@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·3 days agoThank you for this, the picture was really bothering me.
minus-squareDeconceptualist@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-23 days agoThank you! That really bothered me but I was also too busy (read: lazy) to illustrate it myself.
A 175m road scaled in reference to the 35m wide lane:
Quality contribution. I completely overlooked the relative sizes.
Your mum’s fat. And so is your nana.
relatives 🥁
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXivtoSkuVQ
https://xkcd.com/1162/
i mean yeah but how much of that energy can you get out of that uranium, and at what speed?
With about 200kg of the right kind, pretty much all of it quite quickly.
Yeah i was thinking that too, no way 175m is that narrow.
Thank you for this, the picture was really bothering me.
Thank you! That really bothered me but I was also too busy (read: lazy) to illustrate it myself.