• Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    No, they absolutely are accountable - theoretically, owners (capitalist mostly) made sure of that, they (SB) hold CEO by their private parts very firmly & they could do a lot to them & even even directly to their personal wealth (in most countries that’s the standard agreement that can be enforced via courts if need be).

    But shareholders do what’s best for them & their pov.
    So if someone embezzled & they don’t see a clear way to get the money back even paying half a golden parachute can make sense to them (they don’t get extra work, the matter is closed immediately, and CEOs don’t really get paid that much in the context of company/shareholders profits … it’s a different world where CEOs are mere workers and actual workers are factory equipment).

    So, CEO are accountable, they just don’t often get held accountable bcs it’s never to, for, or by the public (and pubic values, common morals, etc).

    • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      That’s true, and but the part

      they just don’t often get held accountable bcs it’s never to, for, or by the public (and pubic values, common morals, etc).

      Is the “special” part of it. If they were held accountable by their peers, their peers might also be held accountable. Class solidarity in action.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        CEOs get held accountable by the SB, the whole point of having a MB is to let them deal with the pleb (“peers”). Shareholders are not the peers of CEOs, it’s a master & dog situation.