Throughout history generally the angrier and more violent side gets their way.
That doesnt mean one should resort to violence but we shouldn’t be afraid or hesitant to make those that wish to perpetuate injustice angry. In fact our own anger should supersede their inhumanity.
The bigger problem with this strategy is it further legitimizes the idea of a third term president which we shouldn’t be using our voices to lend credence to.
Just to play devils advocate.
Throughout history generally the angrier and more violent side gets their way.
That doesnt mean one should resort to violence but we shouldn’t be afraid or hesitant to make those that wish to perpetuate injustice angry. In fact our own anger should supersede their inhumanity.
The bigger problem with this strategy is it further legitimizes the idea of a third term president which we shouldn’t be using our voices to lend credence to.
The conclusion to your rebuttal was my first sentence…
Yes I agree on that point. The larger point about anger still stands.