Nope. Bureaucracy is how you keep a society functioning. There’s nothing inherent in it that makes it bad or inflexible. That’s just poorly implemented bureaucracy.
I want bureaucracy enforcement by smart contract sitting on a public ledger hosted by each individual that verify each other through critical mass making changes only possible by votes.
I wish there was a system for democracy that isn’t relying on human representatives but instead runs automatically through a network that everyone can participate in. In this system, rules and laws wouldn’t be enforced by politicians or government officials—they would be enforced by computer programs called smart contracts. These programs automatically make sure that everyone follows the rules and that nothing can be changed without the proper approval.
Every person in the network would have their own copy of the system running on their device. These copies constantly check each other to make sure no one is cheating or trying to change the rules secretly. If someone tries to break the rules, the network immediately notices and prevents it.
When it comes to changing the rules, nothing happens unless a majority of the people in the network vote in favor. This means that every citizen has a direct say in decisions, instead of relying on representatives who might have their own interests. Every vote and decision is permanently recorded in a transparent, public ledger, so there is no way to tamper with the results.
Applied to an entire democracy, this system could replace elections, legislation, and even enforcement. Policies, budgets, and laws could be proposed, debated, and voted on directly by the people. The system would enforce the outcomes automatically, ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability at every step. In essence, it would create a digital democracy where power truly belongs to the citizens, not to politicians or bureaucrats.
Nope. Bureaucracy is how you keep a society functioning. There’s nothing inherent in it that makes it bad or inflexible. That’s just poorly implemented bureaucracy.
I want bureaucracy enforcement by smart contract sitting on a public ledger hosted by each individual that verify each other through critical mass making changes only possible by votes.
Reworded using AI:
I wish there was a system for democracy that isn’t relying on human representatives but instead runs automatically through a network that everyone can participate in. In this system, rules and laws wouldn’t be enforced by politicians or government officials—they would be enforced by computer programs called smart contracts. These programs automatically make sure that everyone follows the rules and that nothing can be changed without the proper approval.
Every person in the network would have their own copy of the system running on their device. These copies constantly check each other to make sure no one is cheating or trying to change the rules secretly. If someone tries to break the rules, the network immediately notices and prevents it.
When it comes to changing the rules, nothing happens unless a majority of the people in the network vote in favor. This means that every citizen has a direct say in decisions, instead of relying on representatives who might have their own interests. Every vote and decision is permanently recorded in a transparent, public ledger, so there is no way to tamper with the results.
Applied to an entire democracy, this system could replace elections, legislation, and even enforcement. Policies, budgets, and laws could be proposed, debated, and voted on directly by the people. The system would enforce the outcomes automatically, ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability at every step. In essence, it would create a digital democracy where power truly belongs to the citizens, not to politicians or bureaucrats.