And i don’t mean stuff like deepfakes/sora/palantir/anything like that, im talking about why the anti-genai crowd isn’t providing an alternative where you can get instant feedback when you’re journaling
And i don’t mean stuff like deepfakes/sora/palantir/anything like that, im talking about why the anti-genai crowd isn’t providing an alternative where you can get instant feedback when you’re journaling
I don’t see that as feedback but it depends on your definition of feedback. Just having something come out of the AI is not feedback to me.
A writer writes something. An AUDIENCE provides feedback on their writing. An AI can be processing the writing but can’t be an audience because it is just a tool. Just because the AI returned some text back won’t change that fact regardless of the content of the text.
Data is feedback for example. If you change something on a web page and notice a huge drop in visits then that provides actionable information, i.e. feedback. The visitors didn’t vocalize it, you only see it as numbers on a spreadsheet.
True but OP isn’t using AI to collate or analyse data of the visitors to his website.
As I said, it’s how you use the tool. Every usecase is not valid. In a LOT of cases AI is not useful or efficient and it’s sometimes doing more harm than good.
A recipient responds. If you consider the response to adapt your work (current or future), that’s feedback.
Not to me. As I said, my definition of feedback is a lot tighter.