So a case of hypocrisy. They manage to quite literally follow through with a clerical error in regards to his sex, even if it was quite literally stated that the written sex was invalid.
Now as a female (clerically) they are mandating (on what terms?) to use a different bathroom. Isn’t that against human rights? To be deprived of functional integration.
Looks like they’re just playing with him on the essence of incorrect sex. He is a victim of an authoritarian figure in which even basic rights of said female are not met.
Girl changing room as well?
He seems to be in limbo regarding that… From the article:
Sounds to me like he gets to use neither.
It’s worth reading the entire article by the way. The fuckery in the details makes it worse.
So a case of hypocrisy. They manage to quite literally follow through with a clerical error in regards to his sex, even if it was quite literally stated that the written sex was invalid.
Now as a female (clerically) they are mandating (on what terms?) to use a different bathroom. Isn’t that against human rights? To be deprived of functional integration.
Looks like they’re just playing with him on the essence of incorrect sex. He is a victim of an authoritarian figure in which even basic rights of said female are not met.
Dumbest administration ever
Critical question right here.