irelephant [he/him]@programming.devM to iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.devEnglish · 7 days agoWe put the Thing That Can't Do Numbers™ in your spreadsheetsprogramming.devimagemessage-square98fedilinkarrow-up1832arrow-down18cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1824arrow-down1imageWe put the Thing That Can't Do Numbers™ in your spreadsheetsprogramming.devirelephant [he/him]@programming.devM to iiiiiiitttttttttttt@programming.devEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square98fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareThirdConsul@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·6 days agoNo third-party research ever arrived at such absurdly low number as 1% error rate. Internal OpenAi research from May 2025 said 50% error rate and growing.
minus-squareturdcollector69@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 days agoThis is a headline from a few weeks ago
minus-squareThirdConsul@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 days agoI’m not sure what you’re trying to say here?
minus-squareturdcollector69@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-26 days agoJust giving evidence that companies are bailing from AI, fuel for the fire so to speak
minus-squareThirdConsul@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 days agoAh, sorry, I though you were disagreeing with me by posting a link that companies are unsuccessful with it, so I was confused - because my point was that error rate is gigantic. My bad!
No third-party research ever arrived at such absurdly low number as 1% error rate.
Internal OpenAi research from May 2025 said 50% error rate and growing.
This is a headline from a few weeks ago
I’m not sure what you’re trying to say here?
Just giving evidence that companies are bailing from AI, fuel for the fire so to speak
Ah, sorry, I though you were disagreeing with me by posting a link that companies are unsuccessful with it, so I was confused - because my point was that error rate is gigantic. My bad!