Argument about why an instance doesn’t want to federate with another instance that’s devoted to political trolling. Apparently that kind of behavior is simply a core tenet of the belief system, and to criticize it is to reject the whole ideology.
Argument about why an instance doesn’t want to federate with another instance that’s devoted to political trolling. Apparently that kind of behavior is simply a core tenet of the belief system, and to criticize it is to reject the whole ideology.
You gotta imaging anyone spending as much time as them anywhere on the internet, doing that much typing, being so obtuse and weird.
They will always respond. They have infinite time and energy, they will never engage your argument in any form of good faith unless it exactly meets their political requirements, and their job is to find a way to find classify you as an out group the minute you wrong- think.
Engage if you want with that in mind, they also won’t block you, which is fun in a different way.
So what would an acceptable “good faith” way of disagreeing with you look like? Because at a certain point it just seems like anything other than just immediately conceding to you is considered “bad faith”
I mean, if you can honestly look at these back an forths and think they resemble anything approaching a rational conversation and not just circular meta discussion with the intention of targeting the person making the argument, then you aren’t looking to talk to me about. You are looking for padding to put around the sharp parts of my opinions.
Starting the convo by Sea lioning in a post about a dude who was banned for sea lioning is also hilarious, i want to commend you for that.
looks around nervously Haha yeah… yeah…
Lmao, you’re one of the good ones Phil!
Ha, I appreciate it