ByteOnBikes@discuss.online to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 4 days agoCivil rights is cookedlockdiscuss.onlineimagemessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up1595arrow-down134file-text
arrow-up1561arrow-down1imageCivil rights is cookedlockdiscuss.onlineByteOnBikes@discuss.online to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 4 days agomessage-square99fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareWanderingThoughts@europe.publinkfedilinkarrow-up34·3 days agoAnd the conclusion is that you need a system that allows multiple parties to get some competition going instead of winner takes all.
minus-squaredreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·edit-23 days agowhich party is fighting for that at the national level? I don’t hear the sound of democrats falling over each other to start promoting more parties in govt. Not even going to consider the republicans.
minus-squareSaraTonin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·3 days agoBetter yet, a system which requires co-operation between different parties
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down1·3 days agoWe already have that. They’re all working together in the same buildings and serving the same disgustingly privileged people.
And the conclusion is that you need a system that allows multiple parties to get some competition going instead of winner takes all.
which party is fighting for that at the national level? I don’t hear the sound of democrats falling over each other to start promoting more parties in govt. Not even going to consider the republicans.
Better yet, a system which requires co-operation between different parties
We already have that. They’re all working together in the same buildings and serving the same disgustingly privileged people.