me when I can’t argue anything of substance against the smarter person but I still want to be willfully ignorant and keep doing the stupid shit I’m doing
Yes, the fact that you’re from the same instance is why I think you two know each other. Not the fact that you’re both active at the same time, responding to me in tandem, and going several comments deep in different comment threads to defend each other against me. How many comments deep were we when your friend responded to me the first time, again?
I dont even know Norah but she clearly made a more substantive argument, that you just accused of “intellectual dishonesty” and declared yourself the “smarter” person, get some perspective lol
Did she? Did she make a substantive argument? Pretty sure she just said some stupid shit comparing intentionally walking into a specific place of worship with an article being in someone’s feed. They’re not really comparable for, well, a LOT of reasons. So no, she didn’t say anything substantive to me.
Yes she did. She did make a substantive argument. Pretty sure she just said some clever shit comparing intentionally walking into a specific place of worship with intentionally walking into a specific article in someone’s feed. They’re really comparable for, well, a LOT of reasons. So yes, she did say something substantive to me.
Hang on, gotta triple comment because holy shit this is just staggering.
If you think deliberately physically transporting yourself to a location to enact a show of hatred is the same as leaving a comment on an article that popped into your feed is, in ANY WAY comparable, that means you are too chronically online. Those are just not comparable things, and to act like they are makes you delusional.
Well I was just trying to mirror how “substantive” your comments are but, if you think deliberately physically transporting yourself to a location to enact a show of hatred is not the same as deliberately physically opening an article about a muslim person that popped into your feed to enact a show of hatred is, in ANY WAY incomparable, that means you are too chronically online. Those are very comparable things, and to act like they are not makes you delusional.
me when I can’t argue anything of substance against the smarter person but I still want to be willfully ignorant and keep doing the stupid shit I’m doing
#iamverysmart
the smarter person
:3 “i can’t win an argument with substance so instead I’ll just have my friends come defend me with memes”
ok pal. love u.
big all [minority] people know each other energy
Cry more. What minority group, trans? Same, sister! So maybe why don’t you keep to relevant arguments, maybe?
You’re the one that assumed a fellow Blahajian was my friend ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Yeah for sure, I totally believe that you two don’t know each other lol. Good cover!
There’s like 10k users on blahaj, besides I thought you were very smart?
Btw, let me be clear:
I’m not smart.
Just smarter relative to you.
Yes, the fact that you’re from the same instance is why I think you two know each other. Not the fact that you’re both active at the same time, responding to me in tandem, and going several comments deep in different comment threads to defend each other against me. How many comments deep were we when your friend responded to me the first time, again?
I dont even know Norah but she clearly made a more substantive argument, that you just accused of “intellectual dishonesty” and declared yourself the “smarter” person, get some perspective lol
Did she? Did she make a substantive argument? Pretty sure she just said some stupid shit comparing intentionally walking into a specific place of worship with an article being in someone’s feed. They’re not really comparable for, well, a LOT of reasons. So no, she didn’t say anything substantive to me.
Yes she did. She did make a substantive argument. Pretty sure she just said some clever shit comparing intentionally walking into a specific place of worship with intentionally walking into a specific article in someone’s feed. They’re really comparable for, well, a LOT of reasons. So yes, she did say something substantive to me.
Hang on, gotta triple comment because holy shit this is just staggering.
If you think deliberately physically transporting yourself to a location to enact a show of hatred is the same as leaving a comment on an article that popped into your feed is, in ANY WAY comparable, that means you are too chronically online. Those are just not comparable things, and to act like they are makes you delusional.
Well I was just trying to mirror how “substantive” your comments are but, if you think deliberately physically transporting yourself to a location to enact a show of hatred is not the same as deliberately physically opening an article about a muslim person that popped into your feed to enact a show of hatred is, in ANY WAY incomparable, that means you are too chronically online. Those are very comparable things, and to act like they are not makes you delusional.
delusional rambling and elementary school level rhetoric that makes you look even dumber
ok bud
“Intentionally walking into a specific article in someone’s feed” 😭 holy shit get a grip
lol. ok bud.