Do you need a pictogram because the obvious isn’t so obvious to you or is that an attempt at a gotcha question but you don’t quite understand how to actually pull that off?
My point was that, whatever the shape of the killing implements, the fact that they’re used for genocide is more important. A genocide Draiman is evidently supporting.
My point is the difference between a bullet and a nuke matters.
No one is arguing it isn’t genocide support, I’m arguing for accuracy. I’m not certain why you’d rather argue against being clear on things like I dunno the difference between a genocide and a defensive action. Words matter, words matter more when you’re a journalist because your words inform others.
And what were these artillery shells intended for?
Do you need a pictogram because the obvious isn’t so obvious to you or is that an attempt at a gotcha question but you don’t quite understand how to actually pull that off?
My point was that, whatever the shape of the killing implements, the fact that they’re used for genocide is more important. A genocide Draiman is evidently supporting.
My point is the difference between a bullet and a nuke matters.
No one is arguing it isn’t genocide support, I’m arguing for accuracy. I’m not certain why you’d rather argue against being clear on things like I dunno the difference between a genocide and a defensive action. Words matter, words matter more when you’re a journalist because your words inform others.