So I’m trying to kick a bad doomscrolling habit I’ve developed around political news specifically. I’d like to find a balance between “constant low-grade desensitized misery from watching a burning world” (where I’m at now) and “ignorant bliss indifference interspersed with periodic shock followed by deep depression at how bad it’s gotten” (how I ended up when I tried to cut out the news completely in the past).

How do you handle this?

Some ideas I’ve found so far:

  • Curate your news sources. What are some sources for US/Global politics that aren’t totally doompilled, but also don’t shy away from scary/inconvenient topics like the collapse of US democracy or the genocide in Gaza?
  • Limit news intake. How do you manage this, when every outlet is doing their utmost to make you click on article after article, video after video? And how do you fight the internal impulse to doomscroll?

Any other ideas?

  • Mellow@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    9 days ago

    I prefer SAN. Particularly their Bias Breakdown episodes.

    For me it’s the bias, omission of facts, and rage bait that puts me in a bad mood.

    I also visit MBFC almost every morning. On Saturday’s they have a quiz which can be kinda fun.

    • scintilla@crust.piefed.socialEnglish
      1·
      9 days ago

      Yeah… reading Straight Arrow News and thinking it’s unbiased would be a way to be more positive. Probably enjoy the news of people being deported to random counties if you read it long enough.

  • Cosmoooooooo@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    9 days ago

    Why don’tcha doomscroll some history. Particularly history where nazism was overcome by the allies, or where people trapped in religious theocracies were set free.

    Also crazy thought: DO something about it.

  • Artisian@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1·
    9 days ago

    Both are much easier if you have an RSS feed setup, though I think there’s a need for better filtering and self hosted options. You should and can restrict to the main items of a few trusted sources, and the feed need not be addictively designed. You should also set it to pull only one or two items a day from a given source.

    A few news sources that have been fine:

    Our world in data (covers long term issues like poverty, disease, and climate)

    Associated press (fact based and short; most other news is reposting their stuff)

    The conversation (accessible articles by academics on their areas of specialty)

    And I’ll encourage you to find some local news outlet to follow as well. There are some good investigative local outlets, perhaps literally targeted for you, who could both use support and really help you get context.

    But with RSS I think you can have a healthy relationship with more classically ‘bad’ news outlets. If you see who published it before the headline, you can interpret it better.

    Finally, I strongly suggest a rule that if you see a headline you must read the article. Block and stop visiting places where you’re only looking at the first sentence devoid of context and authorship. If you read an article and it is terribly done, really consider blocking the source. Browser extensions can help.