you’re going to ancient history in the desperate attempt to find somebody who has killed more people than your country. you’ve already lost the argument, bud.
I know, but that doesn’t change the fact that them trying to dig through history to find somebody worse kind of negates whatever moral high ground they think they have.
it doesn’t matter if I “restricted” history at all, you turd. the point of the fucking argument, had you the mental acuity to fathom it, was that if you’re so defensive that you need to look through history at all, for any length of time, or period, or context, to find some group that has killed more people, then you have no moral high ground and whatever it is that you’re defending is obviously evil.
you’re going to ancient history in the desperate attempt to find somebody who has killed more people than your country. you’ve already lost the argument, bud.
WW2 is ancient history?
The image attached to your post:
So its already set up for people to argue on that claim.
I know, but that doesn’t change the fact that them trying to dig through history to find somebody worse kind of negates whatever moral high ground they think they have.
As long as you’re requiring that “history” is restricted to only the timespan that supports your hyperbole… Why not? 🤷🏼♂️
it doesn’t matter if I “restricted” history at all, you turd. the point of the fucking argument, had you the mental acuity to fathom it, was that if you’re so defensive that you need to look through history at all, for any length of time, or period, or context, to find some group that has killed more people, then you have no moral high ground and whatever it is that you’re defending is obviously evil.
now get the fuck out of here, statist.