• TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 minutes ago

    No shit sherlock.

    Autism isn’t one thing, it’s an umbrella term for tons of different degrees and various behaviors that often overlap with and co-minging with other neurological conditions. Oftentimes it’s barely differentiable.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 minutes ago

    There are many genes associated with autism, such as SCN2A, ANK2, and SHANK2. Any disruption to the gene expression of these genes can cause autistic traits. There are many diseases that disrupt these genes, and they can even have an effect after brain development.

  • janNatan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    49 minutes ago

    Based on a couple responses, I think it is important to remember that science depends upon testing of hypotheses, no matter how “obvious” they may seem. We are not the armchair philosophers of yesteryear.

    Now that we’re starting to establish that autism may be a whole series of conditions, (which will still need further validation and hence more studies of the exact same thing) we can start identifying them in order to better understand them.

  • eleitl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    43 minutes ago

    Same thing with ADHD. There are at least two distinct subtypes, but likely more.

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    obviously. society treats neurodivergency as, well, “divergent” when honestly, it could probably just be considered a different normal.

    not unlike many other variations in behaviour, am i overthinking this?

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 minutes ago

      No. The problem is pathologizing it. And those who self-pathologize themselves over it and use ‘normie’ as an insult.

      Sadly people generally have a obsessive need to pathologize and demonize anything different than them.

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Isn’t that why we call it a syndrome? I mean, that’s something that everyone with a minimum of insight in the matter knows.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Looking back on medicine’s understanding of mental conditions, where things got lumped into ridiculous categories like “idiocy,” and then treated with lobotomies, it’s extremely easy to imagine that we are far from understanding it all.

    • frunch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      That’s it, next time i can’t be bothered to make another uncomfortable phone call I’m using the Tylenol™ Defense®

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    So I should stop taking Tylenol? Crap! What if I smear Ivermectin all over my face, will that work? Or will it just make me a republican.

  • individual@toast.ooo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    might be a little early in the history of science and health as phenomenons to make full conclusions