Sure. But that’s missing the crux of the point, which is confusing given the context (a picture of a girl posing for a picture) and the caveats (posing/touching, not just snapping a picture of a crowd).
I read it closely and I agree. Men will take it as don’t get near don’t, move. Women will take it as any minor annoyance counts as SH. And both miss the nuance of it being that you can snap public areas, but no one owes you a touch or personal picture.
It’s not illegal to take pictures in public areas.
Sure. But that’s missing the crux of the point, which is confusing given the context (a picture of a girl posing for a picture) and the caveats (posing/touching, not just snapping a picture of a crowd).
It’s a mixed message.
I read it closely and I agree. Men will take it as don’t get near don’t, move. Women will take it as any minor annoyance counts as SH. And both miss the nuance of it being that you can snap public areas, but no one owes you a touch or personal picture.
That is a weird essentialist assumption.
Everything I stated was a fact, not one word in that sentence was a fact.
It’s a bit of a gray area if they are indecent (pictures) and/or if the event is admission-only (which a lot are).