From 4chan

  • √𝛂𝛋𝛆@piefed.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Who would not be looking? To dress like that and expect otherwise is sadistic IMO. She is beautiful and sexy AF.

    IMO she has every right to dress however she wants. That is in no way consent to touch or invade her personal space, but it is an open invitation to take in and admire the art. That includes observing the art at a magnitude similar to the extraordinary nature of the state of dress.

    In the 4chan post this came from, there are mp4 vids of people doing undercarriage shots and looking for wardrobe malfunctions. Perhaps those are staged and consensual; I am not here to judge if others do or do not consent to such behavior. I am odd in these types of emotions because I am more of an ideal outlier male; tall, broad shoulders, average+ looks. If I were a girl, I would be a slut that likes the attention; I am a slut that likes the attention… lol. I don’t want some random person walking up and touching me in a cycling kit, but if you want to look at the bulge in my shorts, whatever, I don’t care. I did not wear them for you. I wear them for a reason, but if I am in public and you look, it would be idiotic of me to get offended.

    Anyways, it may be outlier behavior for someone that wants to be looked at, but that is a totally valid choice in life too. Being sadistic about dressing in an extraordinarily revealing way and then complaining about people looking, is just as bad as the malevolent deviant that believes any form of clothing or external context is consent from another person. Even full open and explicit nudity in any public or private context is not de facto or implied consent.