Jo Miran@lemmy.mlM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 days agoThe Whatever Rule: Gen-X does not existlemmy.mlimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up192arrow-down10
arrow-up192arrow-down1imageThe Whatever Rule: Gen-X does not existlemmy.mlJo Miran@lemmy.mlM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squareNorah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·5 days agoThere are still Boomers in their 60s.
minus-squareJo Miran@lemmy.mlOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·5 days agoThe point is that just about the entirety of Gen-X falls into their range uet they chose to only mention Boomers. Fine by me, its just hilarious how they always forget the existence of an entire generation.
minus-squareaim_at_me@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days agoI feel like boomer is just synonymous with old people at this point.
There are still Boomers in their 60s.
The point is that just about the entirety of Gen-X falls into their range uet they chose to only mention Boomers. Fine by me, its just hilarious how they always forget the existence of an entire generation.
I feel like boomer is just synonymous with old people at this point.