Authors and artists are currently dismayed that AI is replacing them. More and more books are coming out that are AI copies of their own books and artworks on Amazon.
So what are they doing against this. Do they vow to boycott Amazon and stop selling on the retail giant known for countless labor violations?
No, instead they blame AI and “people who use AI” (whatever that means). It’s simple not to use AI, they say: learn to draw. Learn to write. Learn to code. Learn to organize your own messy thoughts. Learn to read through the lines. Learn geopolitics. Learn photography. Learn five more jobs.
And perhaps in 20 years from now you can start actually living. People were not learning to draw before AI; they gave up if what they wanted did not exist. Not everybody is going to invest their free time into your hobby.
It’s pretty blatant that this is the reckoning of a class of people, the ‘artisans’, with the reality that the skill they thought would never be automated… is getting automated. This is not speaking on quality, output volume, etc. Without any qualitative qualifiers needed, their work is objectively getting automated. And they are lashing out.
But they sold their work on Amazon for years without complaints, even as the drivers who deliver their physical copies pass out at the wheel from being overworked and not having access to A/C.
I put artisan in quotes because it reveals what they are: the petite-bourgeoisie. Most of them are not socialists in any way, they only care about their profits. The fact that they work mostly by themselves, or as freelance authors (delivering a book to a publisher who then handles the rest of the process, e.g. printing, marketing) doesn’t change their class nature.
Even as Amazon itself is investing in AI, like all tech giants, they are still selling on the platform. They will sooner abandon their values than their profits.
I could say more, but it would be a pale copy of this essay: https://polclarissou.com/boudoir/posts/2023-02-03-Artisanal-Intelligence.html, and I couldn’t do it justice. You should read it.
I will leave you with what prompted me to make this quick write-up:
Taking his own books off Amazon doesn’t seem to have crossed his mind. He sees the sales numbers on the copies and thinks, each one of those is a lost customer.
Lets dive into this then.
Who is really “creating” things here?
It is only the people who take a pen or whatever else to shape reality to match their mental image while that image is.being impressed by the outside world.
“Deserve” imo is moralistic and therefore not marxist. Also, before AI, people were doing things for their mental health all the same. There is no meat on the argument here.
As I said, it is the system that is the problem. Depriving people from getting their material needs met is a stupid idea. “Fixing” that by selling your work (ie “art”) is just a bandate.
Because ideas are cheap. They are one thing that is wrong with intellectual property.
When a photographer clicks a photo, is it credited to the photographer of to the camera? It’s a mix of both
The camera is not a person, so its the photographer
You’re leaving out an important part. If a person paints a picture or makes a sculpture and a person takes a picture, who is considered the artist here? First, the original artist, then by much lesser degree the fotographer. Because the camera and the fotographer dont have art if the original artist didnt create it in the first place. Thats the whole problem with ai. Its not your art. Its someone elses. You’re just remixing it. The reason why it is hyped is because it is novel and because it keeps the empire going. Its colonialism turned inward, again.
The photographer can just go somewhere else too. They don’t have to take all their photos inside the museum.
Its the same with diffusion. Theoretically, one could remake the mona lisa over and over and be very uncreative. But most people won’t do that, as the whole idea behind diffusion was to create images that never existed before. To let creativity go wild.
I’m not saying it doesnt have a place. It still wrecks the world and i will always be an avid critic. Discussions about AI are the same as AI itself, never ending, barely changing repetitions of the same things, wasting resources in the process.
When I put clothes into the washing machine, press the buttons, and take them out later, who washed the clothes? I did. I used the machine.
I wrote the prompt. I chose the model. I chose the size, stepcount, LoRA. I adapted the prompt. I put the image in again. The image is my creation.
Before AI, people were doing the things they could for their mental health too, yes. But those who couldn’t, were left in the dust. There are still many people left who can’t do enough for their mental health, but for some, their life got slightly better.
Edit: opsec
Removed by mod
Eww. What the fuck?