@[email protected] I think what might be a fun way for Starbucks workers trying to win #labor recognition and #educate customers - is to do a #strike variant: keep the doors open, but give away company coffee, pastries etc. for FREE.
This type of protest has been done in the past successfully. Imo it’s a great way to protest as it can help get the customers on their side (and spread news) , and it also increases the costs compared to just having the store closed for a day.
I guess it could depend highly on the contract of the employee, as if “taking payment” is not actually stipulated then they wouldn’t be breaking their contract - could be possible for someone like a barista who only makes coffee. Admittedly I have no insight into their position types nor contract
I can see how it would be effective in getting the public on your side, of course, and I don’t object in principle. I’m merely thinking of how the other side could exploit this. If it’s worked in the past, cool.
Why do you not consider wage theft unpredictable schedules and subpar wages on record profits to be theft, but giving away coffee prepared by your own labor is?
What I’m saying is that I was taught to err on the side of the law in labour disputes because the corp can and will use any misstep to discredit your cause.
Sure. Fyi, I live in Germany, we have a functioning union system and workers councils. Not perfect but I wouldn’t trade it for whatever you’re dealing with over there.
Oh. Sorry for assuming you were a delusional boot licker; I still think you should be more willing to set shit on fire, but Americans tend to act like they have what you do when clearly not, and it’s just so disconnected from reality.
Idk, wouldn’t that count as stealing? Seems like a step too far. (Happy to be educated to the contrary)
Edit: not that I object to stealing from megacorps as such but you’d be liable which would hurt the strike, no?
This type of protest has been done in the past successfully. Imo it’s a great way to protest as it can help get the customers on their side (and spread news) , and it also increases the costs compared to just having the store closed for a day.
I guess it could depend highly on the contract of the employee, as if “taking payment” is not actually stipulated then they wouldn’t be breaking their contract - could be possible for someone like a barista who only makes coffee. Admittedly I have no insight into their position types nor contract
I can see how it would be effective in getting the public on your side, of course, and I don’t object in principle. I’m merely thinking of how the other side could exploit this. If it’s worked in the past, cool.
Common old fashioned style of strike.
Why do you not consider wage theft unpredictable schedules and subpar wages on record profits to be theft, but giving away coffee prepared by your own labor is?
Dude.
I said no such thing.
What I’m saying is that I was taught to err on the side of the law in labour disputes because the corp can and will use any misstep to discredit your cause.
The corp owns the law is the law.
Your attitude, especially in times like these, are why american labor gets treated like shit, why our unions are worth nothing.
Sure. Fyi, I live in Germany, we have a functioning union system and workers councils. Not perfect but I wouldn’t trade it for whatever you’re dealing with over there.
Oh. Sorry for assuming you were a delusional boot licker; I still think you should be more willing to set shit on fire, but Americans tend to act like they have what you do when clearly not, and it’s just so disconnected from reality.